NEW! Google Custom Search
Open letter to Taunton owners, investors & general manager
Open letter to Taunton owners, investors & general manager (post #68991)
I remember years ago having a subscription to Gormet magazine.
At some point, I thought 'something has changed'. Fewer recipes, more glitzy advertising, recipes that start on page 11 then continue on page 97 hidden below an ad for Swiss watches.
A little research showed the magazine had been sold to Conde Naste.
I walked away & never looked back.
Fine Cooking was a 'breath of fresh air' with a format that indicated that they cared about their subscribers.
As a subscriber living in Hawaii, I realized that my copy was being shipped 3rd class (barged) & would consistently arrive 2 months late, in poor condition and sometimes not at all.
I dropped my subscription but continued to pay more for a newsstand copy.
Peering at my bookshelf reveals that I have hard copies starting with #4 & going through 2008.
I simply realized there was no reason to continue accumulating more paper copies that take up space & end up being more effort than it is worth to find a remembered recipe from a few years ago.
When Taunton began offering their online search I paid for the premium membership. The concept of 'going green' appeals to me even though I'm not saving that many trees or postal deliveries.
I came to realize that the website was sluggish & the search function was far from complete or accurate, but still was decent value for the money paid.
It was a pleasure to look in from time to time on the Cooks Talk forum. Here was a source of highly skilled cooks willing to freely share the benefit of their experience. A quick scan through their Tried & true archives was bound to find something to inspire me that I could try with confidence.
The feeling of 'community' that existed just reinforced my sense of brand loyalty to the Taunton organization.
About mid-December, I clicked onto the forum & felt like I had just walked into a hornet's nest.
I quickly concluded that the experience was completely changed with interesting possibilities, but badly broken. It was a jumble of lack of information or direction & angry people. In due course I read the open letter to forum members from Jason Rezvon. I was shocked & appalled at the arrogance & lack of humanity shown by this communique.
As an enquiring mind, I had to think through why this was happening.
Two thoughts come to mind:
1. The new director has the support & blessings from Taunton management to make such a statement.
2. Taunton has become clueless about its future and while lost in the digital wilderness, succumbed to the first fast-talker that said "Trust me, pay me big bucks & I'll turn this around for you".
In either case, my decision is that I have overstayed my desire to become a part of Taunton's new reality.
Discussions have indicated that there has been a LOT of staff turnover in the Fine Cooking magazine.
Does this mean that seasoned knowledgable people are leaving (or being pushed out) to make room for newcomers who will work for less pay?
How long before I glance at the new issue of Fine Cooking at
a newsstand & the banner text proudly proclaims:
"Ten new ways with Jello & Velveeta".
Taunton used to be a welcome visitor to my online world, but you have taken to flooding my in-box with persistent offers to buy things to the point where you have become a noisy irritation.
I feel that I have come full circle and am ready to walk out the door without a backward glance.
I believe that if Taunton wants to salvage what is left of its formerly fine reputation it needs to:
Make a public acknowlegement that a collosal blunder has been made.
Make a public apology to the people they have alienated. (Long term subscribers, & forum folks who have tirelessly provided free advice to newcomers who then felt a bond to your organization.
Serve up the head of the jackass-in-charge on a platter.
I wish Taunton well & hope you can prosper in spite of yourselves or hopefully that you percieve a wake-up call and realize that you have some fences to mend.
I'm glad I knew you when ...
Myron Nyquist
former subscriber & word-of-mouth advertizer
Who is Luke?
and
Why is his warm water
better than any other brand?




thank you for saying what (post #68991, reply #1 of 14)
thank you for saying what many feel, Myron. I am mostly staying away as I find CT so cumbersome to navigate now, but I come in from time to time, hoping. Surely there was a better way to make the change and not alienate so many good folk? That in itself SHOULD have the top brass wondering. Unfortunately, I don't think anyone really cares.
Yes, we do feel this way. (post #68991, reply #2 of 14)
Yes, we do feel this way. Unfortunately also, the powers that be will probably feel this is a personal attack rather than a constructive criticism and will delete it.
I've been gone for a couple (post #68991, reply #3 of 14)
I've been gone for a couple of weeks and came back only to find that my high hopes for some positive changes have been dashed.
How much longer should I wait??
http://www.thebreastcancersite.com/
help to provide free mammograms for women in need
How much longer indeed. (post #68991, reply #4 of 14)
How much longer indeed. Hasn't it been a month?
I check in daily, hoping against hope that at least the color has changed. Nope. (Pretend the 'least' is bold and big)
I find this incredibly sad. I know many that have been here since the beginning of the Taunton on-line forum. Changes have been gone through before, but never with such blatant disregard for the users. It boggles my mind that the forums were changed the way they were, it boggles my mind that no one at Taunton seems to care.
How much longer is this going to take to either fix or fold?
But, but, it's SUPPOSED to taste like that!
My personal guess is that we (post #68991, reply #5 of 14)
My personal guess is that we won't see a useable format much before the end of February, although we might see signs of progress before then.
Age is unimportant unless you’re a cheese.
Jean, I think that a lot of (post #68991, reply #6 of 14)
Jean, I think that a lot of people are looking for substantive change here over the course of a week or two. This is just unrealistic. It's going to take considerably longer than that - I'd think more like a month or two, or even more, particularly if there's basically only one person on the technical team.
Software development takes time, just as it takes time to prepare a stew or braise, build a house, grow a garden, or construct a piece of furniture.
It's frustrating as all hell that the conversion to the new forum system was so poorly planned and executed. If we're going to look forward; though, we need, sadly, to have a lot more patience.
Patience never was one of my (post #68991, reply #9 of 14)
Patience never was one of my long suits, Steven. Dammit
http://www.thebreastcancersite.com/
help to provide free mammograms for women in need
Well said. Thank you. (post #68991, reply #7 of 14)
Well said. Thank you.
Reply to StevenB: I disagree (post #68991, reply #8 of 14)
Reply to StevenB:
I disagree on the time frame. Its a matter of motivation and survival instinct. Example: In my business, we relied upon one of our two staff members to do all of the computer billing, computer based work with insurances, and other computer related and techno related stuff. Suddenly, she had a massive brain incident: she was gone as was all of the knowledge.We only had a half time employee left. The half time person was techno phobic.
Within one week we hired a new person who had some, but not alot of computer savvy. The other half time staff member did not even own a computer at home and was techno phobic.
Immediately, they worked diligently every moment of their work day, calling tech support, calling other businesses that had similar tasks and computer software. You couldnt even say hello to them bcause they were so absorbed with all of the minutia of getting the tech side of the business running so taht the whole business did not crash and burn.
Within two weeks, we were in better shape than even before our poor original staff member took ill.
So, bottom line, I think it is taking Taunton way to long to fix this fiasco. Thus, My feelings tell me it is a low priority: taht there are other things they are more absorbed with.
But its okay. I have no problem hanging out in our back up board at Delphi.
It's not that I want to (post #68991, reply #10 of 14)
It's not that I want to defend Taunton, but there's a big difference between using a computer-based billing and accounting system and building the software behind a computer-based billing and accounting system. For the latter, one must determine the requirements, design the system (or system changes), implement (code) the changes, and then perform several different levels of testing (QA), each of which should be expected to find some number of problems that need to be addressed before the new system (or changes) go live. Then you need to implement the changes in the production environment, which may involve significant work, too.
Cutting corners in any of these steps has significant negative consequences. The most common place to cut is QA, which is essentially how we got to where we are today. Taunton didn't test, prior to implementatoin, the changes they were making with their user community (AKA "user-acceptance test") and we've revolted in response. FWIW, they did a poor job with the production implementation step, too. They could have copied all the content over, indexed it over a period of days or weeks and then converted the content created in the intervening period just prior to production implementation (I'm sure that this would have had some technical difficulties associated with it, so it's not as simple as I may be making it sound).
All that said, patience is required. They have few resources on the project (the real indicator of the value they place on the fora). Even if they had more, it would still take time - there's a limit to the number of people you can deploy on any problem (nine women may, on average, produce a baby per month, but that's never in just one elapsed month).
Good explanation Steven. (post #68991, reply #11 of 14)
Good explanation Steven.
I see your point. However, (post #68991, reply #12 of 14)
I see your point.
However, maybe I was not entirely clear. I know that the job that Taunton has to do with the website is far more complex. The analogy was, though, like an SAT question is :
Website Design and fixing is to Computer specialists as Learning to use complex software is to computer illiterate people
Now, maybe you do not think the analogy is accurate. Perhaps it is not accurate. But, I think the larger point I was trying to make is that we felt that we HAD to learn our skills or else the business would crash and burn (and therefore we poured every minute into it) as opposed to what seems to be going on with Taunton, i.e. they seem to be saying (with their behavior) "we don't think its too important to get this website performing well in a timely fashion".
If the fixing of the website was crucial to their survival, in their opinion, it would have been fixed weeks ago. Thats my point.
I agree that you had a (post #68991, reply #13 of 14)
I agree that you had a significantly greater imperative than Taunton. Nonetheless, I'm saying that even with greater motivation, Taunton couldn't produce results in just a week or two.
That sounds like you might be (post #68991, reply #14 of 14)
That sounds like you might be right.