NEW! Google Custom Search
Loading
If anyone wants to be reminded how easy the wide format we formerly had
If anyone wants to be reminded how easy the wide format we formerly had (post #67756)
Gretchen on Sat, 12/05/2009 - 06:50
was to read, Fine Woodworking is still not changed over. I can only imagine their reaction to this format.
WIDE window, readable font. Why not here--just spread to the edge--oh, maybe no ads.
What IS the plan for all the white space Taunton Robyn?
Gretchen
Navigation
Recent Discussions
Barbara Kafka's Roasting Book 24 replies
Anyone made Beef Caronnade? 37 replies
share a magazine 1 reply
Shepherd's Pie 1 reply
Birthday Cake 8 replies
Chocolatier magazine index? 3 replies
Cookies-- what are you baking? 34 replies
Kitchen "bucket list" 2 replies
End Grain Cutting Boards 2 replies
Kitchen Aid Stand Mixer 9 replies
exporting to mastercook 7 replies
Asian Recipes : Fried Rice Creations 2 replies
cookbook inventory on-line 4 replies
Calories 1 reply
Nutrition Information 3 replies
search function 3 replies
Clean up rude language 4 replies
Oct/Nov issue 9 replies




I can just imagine the guys (post #67756, reply #1 of 6)
I can just imagine the guys at Breaktime when this hits over there. The people at Taunton might think WE are being bi+chy, but they ain't seen nuthin yet!
It's already started! The (post #67756, reply #6 of 6)
It's already started! The bi+ching that is.....
I don't like the change one bit, but I'm sure it will accomplish what Taunton seems to want. Less managing needed here (even if it means less traffic) and more traffic to the blog side.
John Svenson, builder, remodeler, NE Ohio
I would suspect more ads for (post #67756, reply #2 of 6)
I would suspect more ads for the white space.
Yes, I have said that (post #67756, reply #3 of 6)
Yes, I have said that elsewhere, but on Epicurious, it is just white space. But not NEARLY as distracting as this.
I agree 100%. Even the CI (post #67756, reply #4 of 6)
I agree 100%. Even the CI boards are cleaner.
Oh we had it good, didn't we! (post #67756, reply #5 of 6)
Oh we had it good, didn't we!